Traveling Pet Owners

UX ResearchUX Design
Role
UX Researcher & Designer
Timeline
August 2024 - December 2024
Research Methods
User Interviews · Qualtrics Survey · Competitive Analysis · Persona Development · Affinity Mapping · Usability Testing
The Challenge

How can pet care services better address the unmet needs of pet owners?

We explore the challenges pet owners face when traveling and use research insights to enhance Rover with new features that address these needs.

01. Methods & Findings

Research Methods & Findings

01. User Interviews

Conducted 5 user interviews (2 females, 3 males) with pet owners to gain insight into their current challenges. These interviews explored key topics such as cleaning, veterinary services, companionship, and pet health.​

View Interview Protocol ↗

Key Findings‍

  • Pet owners worry about ensuring their pets are fed and cared for while they are away.
  • Pet owners need caregivers who respect their home, follow their instructions, and attend to their pet’s specific needs.
  • Pets may display challenging behaviors, such as damaging belongings, escaping, or becoming overly dependent.

02. Qualtrics Survey

A Qualtrics survey with 28 responses was conducted to identify key challenges faced by pet owners and inform the affinity map.

Demographics: 19 cat owners, 7 dog owners, 1 hamster owner, and 1 fish owner.

Key Findings‍

  • Finding reliable pet care is the biggest concern for pet owners when traveling.
  • Pet owners primarily rely on veterinarians and pet professionals for assistance with pet-related issues.
  • Pet products (toys, feeding machines) are the most commonly used external service, compared to apps, training, veterinary care, and daycare.
User Needs Statement

Pet owners traveling out of town need confidence in their pet’s caretakers to ensure peace of mind while they are away.

Usability Research Session
"I often give up on shows because fast subtitles make me feel like I’m studying for an exam rather than relaxing. I just want to understand the slang without missing the scene."
— Participant 04
Contextual Interview & Usability Research Session

"I worry so much about my cats when I'm not home because they can't take care of themselves."

— Participant 02
Contextual Interview
02. Problem Framing

HMW & Jobs-To-Be-Done

How Might We...

01 • Caretaker Trust

How might we ensure pet owners feel fully informed about potential caretakers' experience and trustworthiness?

02 • Pre-Travel Meetings

How might we arrange for pet owners and caretakers to meet comfortably prior to travel?

03 • Real-Time Updates

How might we give just-in-time updates to pet owners while they're away?

Jobs To Be Done (JTBD)

Core Connection

Connect reliable, vetted pet caretakers directly to pet owners.

Peace of Mind

Check-in on pet health and status anytime while traveling.

Flexible Options

Provide flexible, customizable pet care options.

Attentive Care

Provide attentive, personalized care for each pet's unique needs.

03. Persona

Personas

Empathizing with target users was key to our process, so we created fictional personas to better understand their needs, priorities, and pain points. By considering factors like affordability, convenience, reliability, and flexibility, we designed a solution that makes pet care more accessible and dependable for a range of users.

User Satisfaction
Vocabulary Retention
04. Ideation

Brainstorming

As a team, we brainstormed using techniques like Crazy 8s and the Wheel Randomizer. We then revisited user needs and unresolved frustrations to ensure our concept addressed pet owners’ core concerns.

User Satisfaction
Crazy 8s
A rapid ideation technique where each person generates eight ideas in a short amount of time. Through this process, we produced 40 ideas that included 13 distinct design features.​
Vocabulary Retention
Wheel Randomizer
Featuring 13 design features, the activity involved three rounds of discussion where we explored different feature combinations and built on one another’s ideas in a structured yet creative way.
05. Design Solution

Final Idea

Our competitive analysis examined existing pet care solutions, including TrustedHousesitters, Pet Sitters International, and Bark. We selected Rover to enhance because it is a trusted and widely used service that we primarily relied on to find pet care. Rather than creating a new platform, we focused on improving a familiar service based on identified user needs.

Guided by our user needs statement, we asked, “Which features best address users’ needs for trust, flexibility, and inclusivity?” This question led us to focus on the following feature directions for our final prototype:

Customizable Pacing
Feature 01

Match Maker Questionnaire

Pet owners can vet pet caretakers by completing a questionnaire about their pet and preferences, helping identify their care needs and match them with a suitable pet sitter.

Feature 02

Expanding Pet Types

Pet owners can access care for animals beyond dogs and add multiple pets, including different animal types, during pre-screening or after initial setup.

Customizable Pacing

UX Writing

Call To Action: Fetch the Purrfect Sitter Today!​

This button starts the Match Maker Questionnaire and is simple, fun, and playful, just like our pets. It ensures universal understanding without any confusion.

Usability Testing

Scenario

You are a pet owner and are in need to find a reliable, trustworthy pet sitter for your pet while traveling.

Goals

Test the app's navigation usability and identify friction points in the sitter discovery and booking flow.

User Tasks

Task 01 Find your initial pet sitter match.
Task 02 Find other recommended sitters
Task 03 Initiate a direct chat with a recommended sitter.
06. Iterative Redesign

Feedback & Iteration

Based on usability testing, we identified user challenges and ranked their severity using star ratings.

⭑ Users need access to recommended pet sitters without completing the Match Maker questionnaire first.

Before

Pet owners need to complete the Match Maker questionare to see pet sitters.

Before Dual Track
After

Pet owners can select a service and see available pet sitters.

Before Dual Track

⭑⭑ Users need the ability to select the type of animal they need care for before starting the questionnaire.

Before

The app did not accommodate pet owners with multiple pets.

Before Dual Track
After

Pet owners can choose which pet they want to find care for and add a new pet.

Before Dual Track

⭑⭑⭑ Users interpreted “100% Match” as survey completion and expected to see booking options and top sitter matches.

Before

Pet owners saw a match percentage based on their questionnaire responses, with 100% indicating that all their needs were met. They could then chat with the sitter, but couldn’t book immediately.

Before Dual Track
After

Pet owners no longer see match percentages and can either chat with the sitter or book immediately after being matched.

Before Dual Track
07. Interactive Demo

Final Prototype Video Walkthrough

Created a video highlighting potential new Rover features, including a Match Maker questionnaire and an expanded service offering to accommodate other types of animals.

08. Reflections & Takeaways

Reflections‍

Research Informed Design

Identifying gaps in existing solutions helped us recognize that improving an established platform can be more effective than creating a new app from scratch.

Collaboration & Adaptability

Clear role distribution, strong communication, and flexibility allowed the team to collaborate effectively and pivot as new insights emerged.

Future Horizons & Next Steps

Future iterations would expand pet inclusivity, refine the prototype, and include testing with more diverse participants.

Next Case Study

KitchenBot

© 2026 Yesenia Peregrina